search

jasp-stats / jasp-issues

This repository is solely meant for reporting of bugs, feature requests and other issues in JASP.
58 stars 29 forks source link

[Bug]: Visual Modeling - General Linear Modeling X-Axis order does not respect label order. #2934

Open ddaugherty opened 5 days ago

ddaugherty commented 5 days ago

JASP Version

0.19.0

Commit ID

No response

JASP Module

Other

What analysis are you seeing the problem on?

Visual Modeling: Generalized Linear Modeling

What OS are you seeing the problem on?

macOS Intel

Bug Description

Setting the label order in the variable settings usually persists with all of the other plots / graphs but the Generalized Linear Modeling graph under the Visual Modeling module does not seem respect the order the labels are set.
JASP Version: JASP 0.19.1 (Intel) Build Branch: development

Expected Behaviour

Moving a label order should change the order they are listed on the x axis.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Change the order of a label
  2. Create a Generalized Linear Modeling graph using that variable as the dependent.

  3. ...

Log (if any)

No response

More Debug Information

No response

Final Checklist

github-actions[bot] commented 5 days ago

@ddaugherty, thanks for taking the time to create this issue. If possible (and applicable), please upload to the issue website (https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/2934) a screenshot showcasing the problem, and/or a compressed (zipped) .jasp file or the data file that causes the issue. If you would prefer not to make your data publicly available, you can send your file(s) directly to us, issues@jasp-stats.org

tomtomme commented 5 days ago

@ddaugherty I can order x-axis if nominal or ordinal just fine with 0.19.1 stable flatpak. If scale I can confirm, that reordering does not affect the plot - but should it? I think this reordering makes only sense with nomi & ordi. Can you confirm?

Or are you talking y-axis, because above you wrote "dependent" variable

Also: Why are you on "Build Branch: development" Could you test this on 0.19.1 stable?