codecov[bot]
commented
2 years ago Codecov Report
Merging #139 (026017b) into master (2708d63) will decrease coverage by
0.03%. The diff coverage isn/a.:exclamation: Current head 026017b differs from pull request most recent head 622add9. Consider uploading reports for the commit 622add9 to get more accurate results
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #139 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.66% 99.63% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 3299 3299
==========================================
- Hits 3288 3287 -1
- Misses 11 12 +1 | Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| py3.10 | 99.63% <ø> (-0.04%) |
:arrow_down: |
| py3.6 | 99.63% <ø> (-0.04%) |
:arrow_down: |
| py3.7 | 99.63% <ø> (-0.04%) |
:arrow_down: |
| py3.8 | 99.60% <ø> (-0.04%) |
:arrow_down: |
| py3.9 | 99.60% <ø> (-0.04%) |
:arrow_down: |
| ubuntu | 98.39% <ø> (ø) |
|
| windows | 99.63% <ø> (-0.03%) |
:arrow_down: |
| x64 | 99.63% <ø> (-0.04%) |
:arrow_down: |
| x86 | 99.63% <ø> (-0.03%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| src/pypsrp/__init__.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/_utils.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/client.py | 97.58% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/complex_objects.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/encryption.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/exceptions.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/host.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/messages.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/negotiate.py | 97.72% <ø> (ø) |
|
| src/pypsrp/powershell.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
| ... and 4 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact),ø = not affected,? = missing dataPowered by Codecov. Last update 2708d63...622add9. Read the comment docs.
The build process had changed to poetry a few versions back to try out something new and to simplify the build process. After careful consideration this commit migrates back to setuptools but still takes advantage of PEP 517 as the build process.
This also migrates the project layout to a src layout to better ensure that testing is done against a built produce rather than on the source code which might contain setups not present in a wheel (package data not present etc). While not a necessary change for migration back to setuptools this aligns with a few of my other libraries.