Closed pengsida closed 4 years ago
Hi,
please check the supplementary (paragraph: "Continuous Feature Extraction") for a detailed description: https://virtualhumans.mpi-inf.mpg.de/papers/chibane20ifnet/chibane20ifnet_supp.pdf
and let me know if you have further questions!
Best, Julian
Ok, I get it. Thanks for your response. Have a good day!
Hi,
please check the supplementary (paragraph: "Continuous Feature Extraction") for a detailed description: https://virtualhumans.mpi-inf.mpg.de/papers/chibane20ifnet/chibane20ifnet_supp.pdf
and let me know if you have further questions!
Best, Julian
Thanks for your impressive work, I just want to know from what reason you select 0.0722 for d rather than any other number, is there some consideration besides the supp and paper?
@jchibane
I used a displacement that looked intuitive for me and measured the distance, it was this value 0.0722 and I took it. Therefore, this is obviously a hyper-parameter that can be optimized. Also, it is a displacement useful for the scale of data used in our experiments. If someone is using other data, for example 10x the size, also the displacement value should be scaled accordingly.
Best, Julian
I used a displacement that looked intuitive for me and measured the distance, it was this value 0.0722 and I took it. Therefore, this is obviously a hyper-parameter that can be optimized. Also, it is a displacement useful for the scale of data used in our experiments. If someone is using other data, for example 10x the size, also the displacement value should be scaled accordingly.
Best, Julian
Thanks for your answer.
I noticed that there are some displacements in the networks. For ShapeNet32Vox, the displacement is 0.035: https://github.com/jchibane/if-net/blob/master/models/local_model.py#L40 For other networks, the displacement is 0.0722: https://github.com/jchibane/if-net/blob/master/models/local_model.py#L124 Could you tell me the reason?