Closed xiaoma20082008 closed 4 years ago
This is as intended as \sa
is a doxygen command.
@jeff-hykin Doxygen support seems at least a little contriversial with several issues about it.
The following issues complain about doxygen support
While the following issues are in favor of keeping/expanding doxygen support
Would it be worthwhile to publish a version that does not have extended support for any type of documentation comments?
Would it be worthwhile to publish a version that does not have extended support for any type of documentation comments? @matter123
Yeah I think it would be worthwhile to publish multiple versions of the C++ syntax. There have been some issues with ASM integration too. It'd be really nice if we could supply both a grammar and then injections that could be toggled but I think that isn't allowed by default and would be a lot of work as a workaround.
I think we could just start off with
C++ -- extended (ASM, Doxygen, SQL, Regex)
and C++ -- pure
Items such as this should be handled through an extension that utilizes injections. Then the user can select the appropriate extension flavor they wish. The base grammar only needs to provide the correct scopes to drive the extension injections.
Checklist
"C_Cpp.enhancedColorization": "Disabled"
The code with a problem is:
It looks like:
It should look like:
no spacial keywords in comments
From microsoft/vscode-cpptools/issues/6108 and microsoft/vscode-cpptools/issues/6108