Closed alialrabi closed 6 years ago
@alialrabi I'm not sure what you expect us to do here. You seem to have added a lot of libs on top of what JHipster has (and you seem to have dev dependencies in-app dependency, which is bad)
Also, you say you have a big app, so obviously the bundle size becomes bigger and slows down the app.
We added lazy loading support in JHipster v5, so you could check that and see how you can reduce your init bundle size.
I suggest you to take this to stack overflow if you need further help as this is not a bug. You cant just add everything and expect great performance as well.
This ticket has been closed as the guidelines are not followed.
Tickets must follow our Guidelines, as mentioned in:
We have also created a template on the "create a new ticket" page to help you follow those guidelines.
If this is indeed a JHipster bug, please open a new issue with proper details or update this issue with all details and request to reopen. Issues opened without proper details will be closed without explanation.
If you have a question please use Stack Overflow, and tag the question with jhipster. This helps the project to keep the issue tracker clean. Also, Stack Overflow will give your question a larger audience:
Overview of the issue
I have big gateway project with angular libraries, ,very bad performance with dev profile but after deploying with prod profile performance enhanced but still take long time to start and refresh app (almost take 15 second to refresh app).
browser app show size of the following files ,That seems too much
polyfills.bundle.js 2.3 MB vendor.bundle.js 5.2 MB vendor.bundle.js 5.2 MB
Motivation for or Use Case
performance is too bad
Related issues
Suggest a Fix
JHipster Version(s)
JHipster configuration
Entity configuration(s)
entityName.json
files generated in the.jhipster
directoryBrowsers and Operating System
Ubuntu with Firefox and Chrome