nus-se-script
commented
5 months ago [IMPORTANT!: Please do not edit or reply to this comment using the GitHub UI. You can respond to it using CATcher during the next phase of the PE]
Team's Response
No details provided by team.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Command: addmulti allows for extra input parameters that are not required
Using the command addmulti 10 moves on to the next step even though an extra 10 is added at the back of the command.
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2324S2/pe-interim#1656] [original labels: severity.Low type.FunctionalityBug]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
We have auto-correction for our input, intended functionality
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]
## :question: Issue response Team chose [`response.NotInScope`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your reason]
Small issue, for example, "view" vs "view sss" shows me the same results although the help tells me that "view" is the correct command. Just be more strict with accepted inputs.