Closed muzimuzhi closed 1 month ago
This is also caught by the test suite of siunitx
itself: https://github.com/josephwright/siunitx/actions/runs/9507844311/job/26208088716.
```diff
*** 2200,2205 ****
--- 2190,2198 ----
! OK.
I'm happy we get a warning here: I never got round to making sure there was one. So I'll simply adjust the tests (but there is something else to check on first).
Surprisingly, now my initial example won't trigger "Overfull \hbox" any more, neither does the library-003.tex
test in tabularray's repository.
But those "Overfull \hbox" messages added in https://github.com/josephwright/siunitx/commit/b25ee71439c185bc82cba09671714604912e5dab for table-emulation.lvt
test in this repository persist.
I tried with format built on LaTeX 2024-06-01, "Overfull \hbox" didn't come back.
@muzimuzhi It's changes in array
I think (I didn't trace but I know Frank has tightened up as part of the tagging work)
Caught from
tabularray
's regression test, see this job run.When a cell content has more digits than that specified in
table-format
(hence it's wider than permitted), beforehand no message is raised. Since LaTeX 2024-06-01 an "Overfull \hbox" is raised. I don't know if this difference is expected.log