Closed ericmjonas closed 12 years ago
Thanks for this, I'm on a deadline at the moment but everything looks good, just need to make sure this is the correct behavior (or if not technically correct at least desired, i'll admit that json-schema is annoying at some times so i'm in favor of doing things that make sense)
Sorry this slipped for so long, finally looking at it. as I understand it though additionalProperties is for properties (items in a dict) if you want to specify a type constraint on items in a list you want additionalItems. If I'm misunderstanding what you're trying to do though let me know.
a recent fix to additionalProperties makes the test pass without the additional code, additionalProperties is ignored for non-objects, I agree with that decision that another contributor made, and it has the bonus of fixing the issue that you had, going to close this for now b/c I think this is resolved, if you have another error please do re-open
This is a pull req for the additionalProperties bug that I recently filed an issue on. I want to stress:
Thanks!