Missing RFC supports - Githubissues

jselbie / stunserver

Version 1.2. This is the source code to STUNTMAN - an open source STUN server and client code by john selbie. Compliant with the latest RFCs including 5389, 5769, and 5780. Also includes backwards compatibility for RFC 3489. Compiles on Linux, MacOS, BSD, Solaris, and Win32 with Cygwin. Windows binaries avaialble from www.stunprotocol.org.

http://www.stunprotocol.org

Apache License 2.0

1.41k stars 347 forks source link

Missing RFC supports #34

Open Neustradamus opened 4 years ago

Neustradamus commented 4 years ago

Can you add missing RFCs?

There are for STUN:

RFC 3489 - "classic" STUN
RFC 5389 - base "new" STUN specs
RFC 5769 - test vectors for STUN protocol testing
RFC 5780 - NAT behavior discovery support
RFC 7350 - DTLS as Transport for STUN
RFC 7443 - ALPN support for STUN & TURN
RFC 7635 - oAuth third-party TURN/STUN authorization
RFC 8489 - base "new" STUN specs

jselbie commented 4 years ago

RFCs 3489, 5389, 5679, and 5780 are fully supported today. As for 7443/7635 and few others. I have been wanting to support TLS/DTLS so some time now. Some new open source libraries make this much more feasible than before. I've just been waiting for a business need to do it. Basically, waiting for someone to come along make the case: "implement this so it will interop correctly with this other standard or popular thing".

Neustradamus commented 4 years ago

@jselbie: Thanks for your reply!

I have updated my publication and specify last STUN version. RFC 7350/RFC 7443/RFC 7635/RFC 8489

Hope improvements :)

Zxilly commented 5 months ago

I'm wondering where this is going, RFC 8489 defines how the stun protocol works over DTLS.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8489#section-6.2.1

jselbie commented 5 months ago

It all depends on if WebRTC adopts DTLS for STUN. Has this happened?

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:35 AM Zxilly @.***> wrote:

I'm wondering where this is going, RFC 8489 defines how the stun protocol works over DTLS.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8489#section-6.2.1

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jselbie/stunserver/issues/34#issuecomment-2042518270, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHNSF24UALSJ7YZVJVWFXDY4J6J3AVCNFSM4MLXAYU2U5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTN2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TEMBUGI2TCOBSG4YA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

Zxilly commented 5 months ago

https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/334743/6

Someone works on that, but it has stopped for a while.