Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Sorry if I've understood you incorrectly... Why don't you forward traffic for
needed port to this machine?
Original comment by d...@soulblader.com
on 5 Apr 2012 at 12:31
Because it's dynamic port assignment by the protocol to multiple internal
machines - basically SIP initiates a connection from the outside on one machine
- but then another machine picks up the communication on the same port - but
because the source IP changes apparently that causes issues.
The solution is UDP endpoint independent filtering - which is how the option is
shown on other routers. It's described like this:
Endpoint-Independent Filtering:
The NAT filters out only packets not destined to the internal
address and port X:x, regardless of the external IP address and
port source (Z:z). The NAT forwards any packets destined to
X:x. In other words, sending packets from the internal side of
the NAT to any external IP address is sufficient to allow any
packets back to the internal endpoint.
I honestly don't know what the iptables command to accomplish this looks like -
but I'm hopeful that this could be implemented. I do appreciate your work on
the firmware BTW :)
Original comment by themadp...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2012 at 1:19
[deleted comment]
I see now, thank you.
Have you tried to enable 'ALG: H.323' on
http://my.router/Advanced_BasicFirewall_Content.asp ?..
Original comment by d...@soulblader.com
on 5 Apr 2012 at 3:54
Yes I enabled both the H.323 and the SIP ALG's - (one - then the other - then
both) and it didn't seem to help. The first computer that connects has no
issue - the second can't get a connection to work correctly.
Original comment by themadp...@gmail.com
on 5 Apr 2012 at 12:21
I just wanted to mention - with your recent firmware and the ability to pick
the type of NAT operating on the box - this issue is resolved.
Original comment by themadp...@gmail.com
on 4 Jun 2012 at 7:13
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
themadp...@gmail.com
on 4 Apr 2012 at 7:04