Closed SwiftCrown closed 1 year ago
You are most probably right, have you checked whether it creates large differences in the benchmark results ?
@SwiftCrown it's actually more likely to be
rho[:,ly] = (g[0,:,ly] + g[1,:,ly] + g[2,:,ly] +
2.0*g[3,:,ly] + 2.0*g[5,:,ly] +
2.0*g[7,:,ly])/(1.0 + u[1,:,ly])
Hi @SwiftCrown,
Thanks for noticing the mistake. After running a few tests it seems to not significantly affect the accuracy of the results. I just pushed a fix.
Best,
In line 209
rho[:,0] = (g[0,:,0] + g[1,:,0] + g[2,:,0] +
This seems to be
rho[:,ly] = (g[0,:,0] + g[1,:,0] + g[2,:,0] +