kapilt / getpaid

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/getpaid
0 stars 0 forks source link

Checkout address form layout #80

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
The current checkout address form layout doesn't play nice with fixed width
layouts, because each table cell width is determined by the long country
selection widget.
In most cases, with a default font size, this causes the table to have a
width of 840 pixels, which is very close to the minimum site width on
1024x768 monitors, and leaves a very small space for porlet columns.

I attach a screenshot which shows the problem on a fixed width layout of
980 pixels.

In my opinion it would be better to put the two address vertically (Mailing
under Shipping) as the default for this release, or use floating layers in
order have the addresses side by side at high resolutions, and degrade them
gracefully to a vertical layout at low resolutions.

If you agree on this issue I can take it (pretty easy to do).

Original issue reported on code.google.com by fabi...@gmail.com on 18 Aug 2007 at 9:33

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I would also add that the addresses should be formatted as addresses, not like 
fields
spit out with their titles. ie put lable "address" and then write out the whole
address (in total would take up about a third of number of lines on screen). 

Original comment by cjj.ifpe...@gmail.com on 21 Aug 2007 at 2:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Also, the first and second address lines/boxes (and possibly city box) should 
be a
bit wider, so that the address value within can be seen.

Original comment by ctxl...@gmail.com on 7 Sep 2007 at 6:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Please have a look at enhancements done to the layout of address (by kapilt). It
fixed the wide country box issue, but the form is kept narrow (re width of 
address
fields). 

Original comment by cjj.ifpe...@gmail.com on 12 Sep 2007 at 4:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
i think we are done with this one for M1, unless someone wants to take another 
stab...

Original comment by cjj.ifpe...@gmail.com on 23 Oct 2007 at 9:51