Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
For classification of residential/nonresidential, I'd like to propose we just
add a 90.1 specific rule to the Spc:OccClass term. Adding a new flag would
mean other rules that currently reference OccClass would need to be revised to
point to this new flag.
Also, I recommend the terminology for the new space function not be specific to
"high-rise", rather more general as "Residential Dwelling Unit" or something
like that since 90.1 covers 4+ story multifamily. In the eQUEST 90.1 ruleset,
it is "Living Spaces (multi-family)", but I am not crazy about that either,
though it does make it more general since 'Dwelling Unit' and 'Sleeping Unit'
are both residential spaces but have different meaning.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 11 Sep 2014 at 3:36
Noah,
The list looks good.
- Attached - updated Appendix 3.4A which lists the space conditioning category
for all 90.1 space types.
- Added to this list is 'High-Rise Residential Dwelling Unit', which
essentially is a 'Dwelling Unit' for multi-family buildings.
Also added to the PRM, a definition for Space Conditioning Categories, under
3.3.1 Thermal Zones, General Information.
Space Conditioning Category-
Separate exterior building envelope requirements are specified for each of
three categories of conditioned space: (a) nonresidential conditioned space,
(b) residential conditioned space, and (c) semiheated space.
- Non Residential Space Conditioning Category
All occupancies other than residential.
- Residential space conditioning categories-
Spaces in buildings used primarily for living and sleeping. Residential spaces
include, but are not limited to, dwelling units, hotel/motel guest rooms,
dormitories, nursing homes, patient rooms in hospitals, lodging houses,
fraternity/ sorority houses, hostels, prisons, and fire stations.
- Semiheated
See thermal space type definition above.
Original comment by supriyag...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2014 at 6:21
Attachments:
David,
I agree with the proposed terminology revision. I've added the space type as
'Dwelling Unit' at present.
I can see how 'Sleeping Unit' for hotels might be confused with 'Dwelling
Units' for multifamily. Should we rename this to 'Residential Dwelling Units'?
Any other suggestions?
Original comment by supriyag...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2014 at 6:25
'Dwelling Unit' is definitiely consistent with 90.1 terminology, but it would
not fit with a lot of multifamily development that is going on in large cities
like San Francisco and Seattle where there are apartments being built with no
permanent provisions for cooking.
How about the SpcFunc designation of 'Dwelling/Sleeping Unit'? This would cover
the two main residential occupancies that are in the IBC.
Original comment by da...@360-analytics.com
on 16 Sep 2014 at 6:33
Sounds good.
Attached- revised Appendix 3.4 A using this terminology.
Original comment by supriyag...@gmail.com
on 16 Sep 2014 at 6:40
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ncz...@archenergy.com
on 11 Sep 2014 at 3:17