Closed mgautierfr closed 1 year ago
Translatewiki uses « qqq » for comments abour strings. Maybe you can reuse that code?
qqq.json contains only descriptions of messages without placeholders for parameters that must be replaced in the real message. Thus using qqq pseudolanguage in the unit tests will not verify that parameters are properly set in the code.
000
?
Or test
?
@mgautierfr @veloman-yunkan Can we go forward with test
@mgautierfr @veloman-yunkan please use artificial test
Language for testing
@veloman-yunkan Woukd be good if that one could be implemented. Seems straight forward.
Following #679
The current tests on translation are based on Armenian language. But it is subject to translation made on translatewiki. We should use a fake language we could use on test to be sure that translator will not break our tests.