Closed TorkelE closed 2 years ago
Try explicitly using natbib.
For example, in Preamble/preamble.tex replace the Bibliography section (lines 112 to 126 in the GitHub version) with:
% Replaced current bibliography style with a Harvard style
\usepackage{natbib} % Bibliography management
% Use 'numbers' option in natbib if you want a numbered Bibliography
% \usepackage[numbers]{natbib} % Numbered Bibliography
% See https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Bibliography_management_with_natbib
\bibliographystyle{apalike} % e.g., Harvard style
In thesis.tex replace the lines between \begin{spacing}{0.9}
and \end{spacing}
(lines 154 to 170 in GitHub) with:
\cleardoublepage
\bibliography{References/references} % Bibliography comes from references.bib file
Choose style as appropriate, APA example shown above. See also Overleaf's article Bibliography management with natbib
I tried it, but there is no change. Although my .tex document is a bit different, I don't think I got it from GitHub, but maybe directly from overleaf.
First I replaced:
% *****************************************************************************
% *************************** Bibliography and References ********************
%\usepackage{cleveref} %Referencing without need to explicitly state fig /table
% Add `custombib' in the document class option to use this section
\ifuseCustomBib
\RequirePackage[square, sort, numbers, authoryear]{natbib} % CustomBib
% If you would like to use biblatex for your reference management, as opposed to the default `natbibpackage` pass the option `custombib` in the document class. Comment out the previous line to make sure you don't load the natbib package. Uncomment the following lines and specify the location of references.bib file
%\RequirePackage[backend=biber, style=numeric-comp, citestyle=numeric, sorting=nty, natbib=true]{biblatex}
%\bibliography{References/references} %Location of references.bib only for biblatex
\fi
% changes the default name `Bibliography` -> `References'
\renewcommand{\bibname}{References}
with
% *****************************************************************************
% *************************** Bibliography and References ********************
% Replaced current bibliography style with a Harvard style
\usepackage{natbib} % Bibliography management
% Use 'numbers' option in natbib if you want a numbered Bibliography
% \usepackage[numbers]{natbib} % Numbered Bibliography
% See https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Bibliography_management_with_natbib
\bibliographystyle{apalike} % e.g., Harvard style
% changes the default name `Bibliography` -> `References'
\renewcommand{\bibname}{References}
(in the preamble.tex file)
and then I replaced
\begin{spacing}{0.9}
% To use the conventional natbib style referencing
% Bibliography style previews: http://nodonn.tipido.net/bibstyle.php
% Reference styles: http://sites.stat.psu.edu/~surajit/present/bib.htm
\bibliographystyle{apalike}
%\bibliographystyle{unsrt} % Use for unsorted references
%\bibliographystyle{plainnat} % use this to have URLs listed in References
\cleardoublepage
\bibliography{References/references} % Path to your References.bib file
% If you would like to use BibLaTeX for your references, pass `custombib' as
% an option in the document class. The location of 'reference.bib' should be
% specified in the preamble.tex file in the custombib section.
% Comment out the lines related to natbib above and uncomment the following line.
%\printbibliography[heading=bibintoc, title={References}]
\end{spacing}
with
\cleardoublepage
\bibliography{References/references} % Bibliography comes from references.bib file
(in the thesis.tex file)
I just tried the Cambridge template on Overleaf and both the original authoryear
option and the suggestion above works. If the build logs in Overleaf don't provide any additional information, and you don't know which change was made to break the authoryear
option, you may need to try another approach. Maybe start a new Overleaf project and move some content over to make sure that it is not an issue with the default template.
The log files! Of course! I check them, and I get this output:
text form as well, for copying and searchability:
Package natbib Error: Bibliography not compatible with author-year citations.(natbib) Press <return> to continue in numerical citation style.
Searcing on this lead me to https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/54480/package-natbib-error-bibliography-not-compatible-with-author-year-citations which suggested that an entry missing a year could cause it. I did not find any missing year in any entries, but I did find an entry that was malformed. Fixing that caused the citation style to become the desired one!
Thanks a lot :)
See the natbib package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.349 ...and\NAT@force@numbers{}\NAT@force@numbers
Check the bibliography entries for non-compliant syntax,
or select author-year BibTeX style, e.g. plainnat
I tried this and this does not work. I have no errors in the log file. Any ideas?
Is your issue occurring in the starting template? I.e., you can start a new project with the blank template and copy over one or two of your references and relevant text to see if that works. If that works, try a divide-and-conquer approach on a copy of your project to find where possible bad formatting lays. Note that the Overleaf template is not the latest version but you can upload the updated files, though that may not be a factor.
actually \bibliographystyle{apalike}
does not work also on the original version of the Overleaf template.
I am trying to use the
authoryear
citation style by settingunfortunately, it doesn't work, and yields stuff like:
from the text
It looks the same if I try
\cite{1953Benzer}
. I have many citations in the text, some with several references, some with only one. All return this style of citation.If I try changing to
I get this:
just like expected (so that works).
I do not know why this is the case. At some point in the beginning I occasionally had the desired format, but it would kind of change as I added the references in, every time I recompiled it might change. But now that has not happened since I added in the last references.
I am using overleaf. I have no idea what might be causing this, but the behaviour is rather distinct, so I figured it might be helpful to ask.