Closed julienw closed 4 years ago
@niftylettuce thoughts?
Seems like this will require a major version bump, would you agree @JacobMGEvans ?
I am not seeing any breaking changes internally, and issue #44 details out the change really well (probably needs to be added to some documentation).
However, people might have code set up expecting the 200 behavior therefore I would agree that a major bump with a release note annotating the change would be a good idea.
When are you planning to release it?
I added info in #44
TL;DR: it's not a bug, it's a feature.
Fixes #44
Kindly see issue #44 for more information about this patch. Thanks!