Adding more testcases

[emmanuelantony2000]

I'm thinking to add more testcases to the spec_tests. The current tests written are for evm_setNextBlockTimestamp. My opinion on how to proceed with this:

• Create testcases for other similar cheat calls like mine, snapshots, etc.
• They will be translated to hardhat_ or evm_ namespaces as we don't have a test-node as of now that supports the cheat_ namespace. This makes it easy to write test cases and test the conditions out according the proposal.
• Prepare an upgrade path for tests so that they can be switched to the cheat_ namespace easily.

Would love to know any other thoughts on how to proceed with this.

[krzkaczor]

Yes. This is all good idea. I think there should be some kind of mapping (maybe a custom viem client?) that does translation between something like client.setNextBlockTimestamp and calling node_prefix_setNextBlockTimestamp or cheat_setNextBlockTimestamp. This translation layer is important because some calls not only do not follow same naming patterns but even have different signatures.

I will try to push a PoC of this today so you can pick this up tmrw.

[krzkaczor]

@emmanuelantony2000 have a look at https://github.com/krzkaczor/cheatcalls-eip/pull/13