Open indra0007 opened 1 month ago
This issue is currently awaiting triage.
If Karpenter contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted
label and provide further guidance.
The triage/accepted
label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted
in a comment.
It might be related to https://github.com/aws/karpenter-provider-aws/issues/6593. Also FYI the said node has nothing but some daemonset pods so I can consider that to be empty
Description
Observed Behavior: Empty t3.xlarge spot instance not getting deleted
Expected Behavior: Empty Nodes should be deleted
Reproduction Steps (Please include YAML):
Once u performed all above 3 steps, 2 nodes will be created by karpenter (m3.medium and t3.xlarge)
Once both the deployments get deleted then ideally both the nodes should also get deleted one by one as both are empty. But surprisingly
t3.medium
instance gets immediately deleted as expected but not thet3.xlarge
one. It's very surprising that those are behaving differently as those are part of same nodepool and should behave exact same way.No logs emitted from karpenter whatsoever. As if karpenter knows nothing about that
t3.xlarge
node. No relevant events even from that nodeclaim. Below are the set of events from that nodeclaimPlease let me know what's going on here.
Versions: Image version: 1.0.0@sha256:dd095cdcf857c3812f2084a7b20294932f461b0bff912acf58d592faa032fbef
Chart Version: 1.0.2
Kubernetes Version (
kubectl version
): 1.29Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment