Open mbobrovskyi opened 3 days ago
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 45c310b3e6558dad0394a57fa984e868bc4677f1 |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/6749d131a1ee3100083ab115 |
/hold for #3686
/unhold
LGTM, just nits from me. I think we could consider a dedicated KEP for serving workloads, where we could mention the new annotation (and the fast-admission annotation added before), but I wouldn't like to block the PR on it before 0.10, as this is an important fix.
cc @tenzen-y
I synced with @mbobrovskyi and he will create a KEP for serving workloads - starting from the StatefulSet support. We will then extend the KEP with LeaderWorkerSet when we have a prototype. But I think it would be great to merge this for 0.10 anyway.
LGTM label has been added.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: mbobrovskyi, mimowo
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
Alternatively I'm also good with a section in the PodGroup KEP entitles serving workload support.
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Fix rolling update for StatefulSet integration
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3690
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?