Open jihoon-seo opened 6 months ago
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.
This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
/reopen /remove-lifecyle rotten
I'd like this (along with some other contributor experience improvements)
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/reopen
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
/reopen /remove-lifecycle rotten
@petr-muller: Reopened this issue.
It would be great to migrate Prow-related labels from
k/t-i
repo.[As-is] According to https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/label_sync/labels.yaml, These labels exist in
kubernetes/test-infra
repo:plank
has been deprecated.)[Option 1] Migrate Prow-related labels as-is:
plank
has been deprecated.)[Option 2] Since this repo is all about Prow, so remove the
prow
prefix from all labels, and thearea/prow
label itself:plank
has been deprecated.)Which option seems better? Any opinions are welcome!
Note: I don't know whether
label_sync
is enabled for this repo (k-s/prow
). If not, then we need to enable as well.Note: We need to add OWNERS file to each directory, to enable Prow's auto-labeling. (The PR #101 affects the location of OWNERS file that will be added.)
/assign