Closed nikhita closed 2 years ago
Yay, more content! Thank you for thinking of me @nikhita :)
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. /lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 4:46 PM fejta-bot notifications@github.com wrote:
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale. Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta https://github.com/fejta. /lifecycle stale
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kubernetes/steering/issues/170#issuecomment-704200359, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD24BUDIB655ARZJFHPP77TSJL4B3ANCNFSM4OUMVR6A .
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. /lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:58 PM fejta-bot notifications@github.com wrote:
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale. Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta https://github.com/fejta. /lifecycle stale
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kubernetes/steering/issues/170#issuecomment-753947656, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD24BUGWRFSCBTXHY4BI7YDSYGX5TANCNFSM4OUMVR6A .
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 9:12 PM fejta-bot @.***> wrote:
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale. Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community https://github.com/kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kubernetes/steering/issues/170#issuecomment-813054427, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD24BUEEJZ4UPBJ2MIEVLLDTHCCFXANCNFSM4OUMVR6A .
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 at 14:27, fejta-bot @.***> wrote:
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale. Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community https://github.com/kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kubernetes/steering/issues/170#issuecomment-873549617, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD24BUAUVQURNDLITUO6KQLTWAO5ZANCNFSM4OUMVR6A .
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
lifecycle/stale
is appliedlifecycle/stale
was applied, lifecycle/rotten
is appliedlifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle rotten
/close
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
One comment: the purpose of the Committees is to do work that needs to be done in private. As such:
@celestehorgan there are no reporting duties and liaisons will be part of public channels only; this is mainly a way for us to flow information better specifically governance changes and events. An example for cocc’s liaison would be to remind about elections (both cocc and steering) and then possibly help start it like I’ve done in the past.
Opened https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/6260 to continue the discussion. /assign
From @tpepper in Steering agenda doc:
an idea not from the meeting live: Can committees be asked to give a read-out in the Annual Reports? CoCC effectively has one already in the new Conduct Transparency Report. Similar from sec. response could be informative to track abstract workload and committee internal ops health.
In #159 and #168, we added Steering Committee liaisons for SIGs, WGs and UGs but we left out committees because they don't need to submit annual reports.
@parispittman suggested that we should also add SC liaisons for committees so that we have good feedback loops with them (thanks, Paris!)
fyi @divya-mohan0209 this might affect the blog post :)