search

langsci / 163

A lexicalist account of argument structure
2 stars 0 forks source link

Construction (p. 33) [via PaperHive@docloop] #281

Open docloop[bot] opened 5 years ago

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Regarding this part:

phrasal con- structions

Remi van Trijp wrote:

Of course, in a construction grammar, there would be no distinction between c- and f-structure so the construction would be able to access the functional information as well

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

But this is not a problem here. All the levels in LFG can talk to each other. In FCG you also have a SYN pole and a SEM pole. So you are not better off. See Kuhn (2007) on modularity in LFG and HPSG. Kuhn, Jonas. 2007. Interfaces in Constraint-Based Theories of Grammar. In Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, 613–650. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Remi van Trijp wrote:

We got rid of the distinction between syn- and sem-pole in FCG; the real distinction we needed was between comprehension and formulation.

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Stefan Müller wrote:

Do you have a reference?

Link to original comment. About docloop.

docloop[bot] commented 5 years ago

Annotation imported from PaperHive.

Remi van Trijp wrote:

There's a paper by Luc Steels: https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00002.ste but I recommend the PhD thesis by Paul Van Eecke https://ai.vub.ac.be/members/paul

Link to original comment. About docloop.