Open bpj opened 4 years ago
& is a valid operator in Lua, so &= probably shouldn't be used. I'd be more fine with #= given no one should be assigning an int to what was previously a length-able object.
Found myself needing this operator while writing a module that makes use of many of these. I agree it could be really nice to have these. I'd be fine with #=
.
[ ]
is comprehensive and clean. imho
array []= item
I miss an operator for in-place appending an element to an array, e.g.
as syntactic sugar for the common idioms
I guess you could overload
..=
but then you would have to always check if LHS is a table. While#=
may not be immediately obvious it seems reasonable to me. I guess&=
using an as yet unused character might work, although then people might expect&
to concatenate/merge arrays/tables, which would be nice to have, but probably considerably harder to implement.(Apologies if this is a duplicate. I did search the existing issues for relevant keywords but there seemed not to be anything similar.)