Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
currently blocked on bug 456 - can't build on ios.
the ia32 behavior is likely defined by the chromium dependencies. if you could
track back to the last good version, we could try rolling chromium deps back to
that
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 26 Jun 2015 at 9:43
I just posted a solution for that problem in issue 456.
Original comment by kjellan...@google.com
on 28 Jun 2015 at 7:06
When did this last work for ia32?
Try rolling back chromium deps to an older version?
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 29 Jun 2015 at 5:49
The Getting started doesnt show the simulator settings. Starting with arm 64
bit:
arm64
GYP_DEFINES="OS=ios target_arch=armv7 target_subarch=64" GYP_CROSSCOMPILE=1 GYP_GENERATOR_FLAGS="output_dir=out_ios" ./gyp_libyuv -f ninja --depth=. libyuv_test.gyp
ninja -j7 -C out_ios/Debug-iphoneos libyuv_unittest
we get 64 bit arm as expected
bash-3.2$ file ./out_ios/Release-iphoneos/libyuv_unittest.app/libyuv_unittest
./out_ios/Release-iphoneos/libyuv_unittest.app/libyuv_unittest: Mach-O 64-bit
executable
Do 32 similulator like this:
GYP_DEFINES="OS=ios target_arch=ia32 target_subarch=32" GYP_CROSSCOMPILE=1
GYP_GENERATOR_FLAGS="output_dir=out_sim" ./gyp_libyuv -f ninja --depth=.
libyuv_test.gyp
ninja -j7 -C out_sim/Debug-iphonesimulator libyuv_unittest
bash-3.2$ file
./out_sim/Debug-iphonesimulator/libyuv_unittest.app/libyuv_unittest
./out_sim/Debug-iphonesimulator/libyuv_unittest.app/libyuv_unittest: Mach-O
universal binary with 2 architectures
./out_sim/Debug-iphonesimulator/libyuv_unittest.app/libyuv_unittest (for
architecture i386): Mach-O executable i386
./out_sim/Debug-iphonesimulator/libyuv_unittest.app/libyuv_unittest (for
architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 30 Jun 2015 at 11:16
webrtc documents parts of the build
without target_subarch=32 it produces only the x86_64 version.
with target_subarch=32 it produces both and uses lipo to join them.
I've updated Getting Started
Original comment by fbarch...@google.com
on 1 Jul 2015 at 12:00
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ilantzco...@gmail.com
on 25 Jun 2015 at 11:12