Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Is there an easy way for me to reproduce the issue?
Original comment by karlpauls
on 26 Oct 2012 at 12:21
As a first thought, assuming aries 1.0 does use the new 4.3 api, it is possible
that they use features I didn't implement. Again, if you could point me to a
reproducible example (or send me one by mail) I can see whats going on.
Original comment by karlpauls
on 26 Oct 2012 at 12:49
Yeah when i get back in the office mid next week i can zip a project that
reproduces the issue
Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2012 at 4:01
You can create a new project from Maven to reproduce the issue
I am using Maven 3.0.4 and JDK 1.6
mvn archetype:generate
type "camel" to filter to only show camel related
pick the camel-archetype-blueprint
enter details for the project
cd the project
mvn install
will compile and test. This works fine with 0.3 of Aries Blueprint.
If you upgrade Aries to 1.0.0 then it hangs.
You would need to add <dependency> for aries which you can see from mvn
dependency:tree.
I have attached a file where you can easily switch between Aries 0.3 and 1.0.0
to reproduce the issue. Its the blue.zip file.
Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com
on 30 Oct 2012 at 11:00
Attachments:
You need to use Camel 2.10.2 release which is the latest official release.
Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com
on 30 Oct 2012 at 11:00
Well, i can see that the test is failing. I'll try to debug it, however, it
looks like things are working pretty much...
I can see that the message that the test is expecting is send - just not
received or something. In fact, the debug log of camel locks exactly the same
up to the point where it with 0.3 is enough to send one message and with 1.0.0
five messages are send but apparently don't satisfy the test.
Are you sure that this is a pojosr issue and not a an issue with 1.0.0 and your
test support? Feel free to try to catch me on skype (karlpauls) if you want to
discuss it some more. I'll try to look into it.
Original comment by karlpauls
on 30 Oct 2012 at 3:41
Original comment by karlpauls
on 30 Oct 2012 at 3:41
Ok, i have an idea what might be going on. Its related to missing 4.3 stuff -
I'll try to get to it asap.
Original comment by karlpauls
on 31 Oct 2012 at 12:10
Ah great. I have not either had time to debug what happens, but great to know
you are on track.
Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com
on 31 Oct 2012 at 1:12
I have it working now. Test passes and my other stuff seems to work as well.
Required to implement some new features for supporting all the 4.3 event hooks
which I mostly ignored but aries blueprint seems to use them starting with
1.0.0. Took me a while to figure that out as it wasn't super easy to see what
was going.
I'll try to clean it up and commit it tonight or tomorrow morning. I hope you
can test the snapshot a bit more with whatever you have but if it is working
I'll cut a 0.2.0 release on the weekend.
Original comment by karlpauls
on 31 Oct 2012 at 2:45
I pushed my changes. It seems to work for me. At least the test is now passing
with aries blueprint 1.0.0.
Please let me know if this is working for you (in this case and maybe in the
others you have).
I deployed a new snapshot so you should be able to get 0.1.9-SNAPSHOT from
maven, otherwise you can find it here:
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/com/googlecode/pojosr/de
.kalpatec.pojosr.framework/0.1.9-SNAPSHOT/de.kalpatec.pojosr.framework-0.1.9-201
21031.213336-2.jar
Original comment by karlpauls
on 31 Oct 2012 at 9:36
Karl, thanks a lot for helping with this.
I tried the 0.1.9-SNAPSHOT and it works with Aries 1.0.0 and OSGi 4.2.0. I will
try with OSGi 4.3.0 also.
Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com
on 1 Nov 2012 at 6:27
Works also with OSGi 4.3.0
Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com
on 1 Nov 2012 at 7:31
Ok, good. I'll wait until the weekend but if nothing else comes up I'll do a
0.2.0 release which should be available next week then.
Original comment by karlpauls
on 1 Nov 2012 at 12:32
Original comment by karlpauls
on 1 Nov 2012 at 2:11
Original comment by karlpauls
on 4 Nov 2012 at 8:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
claus.ib...@gmail.com
on 26 Oct 2012 at 7:43