Closed Monkeymerlot closed 1 year ago
@Monkeymerlot thanks
Here is the result for fs = 6500S/s, N=5000 S, f_1 = 9 Hz (not commensurate with 6500/5000):
If N is too small then the lockin will not be able to read the buffer fast enough and we will lose samples. I am still testing the new changes but I would like to push them ASAP, maybe this afternoon
Still looks like there is a bit of offset between the two.
@Monkeymerlot try making #s 2x or 4x bigger
It looks better now. N = 2250 and Fs = 2500. 500 MΩ resistor.
Looks great. By increases #s you decrease the update rate. I think if it's too fast then there will be dropped points. I would like to get a better handle on that and take it out of the end users' hands
I have a 10 kOhm resistor for a test and I get the following input: so the values look right but the waveform is cut off and there is a section at the beginning.
Removing the initial wait and changing total time to 10s (and hitting refresh):
Switch to Ramp / from Ramp/\:
Change time of sweep to 3s from 10s: