Closed gsc74 closed 2 years ago
You need to convert to the stable coordinate with misc/mgutils.js stableGaf
FYI: the master branch has just been updated with more accurate alignment.
FYI: the master branch has just been updated with more accurate alignment.
This is good news. Can we expect a stable release of minigraph in near future? Also, there were pre-built graphs provided in minigraph manuscript. Can we expect new human rGFA graphs now?
Can we expect a stable release of minigraph in near future?
I hope to release the current github HEAD in this week. After the release, I will try to improve the performance of minigraph for species of higher diversity (see #62). In this case, full WFA is too slow. I need to implement heuristics in miniwfa and see how heuristics affect graphs.
Can we expect new human rGFA graphs now?
For now, the most comprehensive human graph is the one I built for HPRC with v0.14. Here is the zenodo link. I will update the zenodo repo with graphs generated with the current github HEAD.
Thank you!
I want to evaluate the Performance of sequence-to-graph mapping as shown in
Table 2
in minigraph, for bothminigraph
andGraphAligner
, I'm able to get numbers for minigraph with usingpaftools.js mapeval minigraph_output.gaf
. [paftools.js] Output:Q 60 2778043 13768 0.004956007 2778043
Q 59 828 7 0.004957049 2778871
Q 58 794 6 0.004957792 2779665
Q 57 754 6 0.004958605 2780419
Q 56 838 5 0.004958909 2781257
Q 55 756 4 0.004958999 2782013
........
........
While using same commandpaftools.js mapeval GraphAligner_output.gaf
Output :Q 60 2907330 2907330 1.000000000 2907330
Q 58 1 1 1.000000000 2907331
Q 56 18 18 1.000000000 2907349
............
.............
@lh3 , I want to know what is the difference betweengaf
output ofminigraph
andGraphAligner
, and whypaftools.js
is giving right numbers forminigraph
while wrong numbers forGraphAligner
.