Closed jamesjer closed 9 months ago
Thanks for the question @jamesjer, @hivert what do you think? I'm guessing we want GPL-3.0-or-later?
@jamesjer @james-d-mitchell GPL-3.0-or-later is good for me indeed. I'll try to batch fix the header tomorrow.
Thanks @hivert i'll make another release once the license statements are up to date
Great, thank you for the quick action.
I just sedded the file to fix the copyright statement. It should be Ok now. @james-d-mitchell : may I leave it to you to make the release ? Thanks !
Thanks @hivert I'll make a new release today
Hopefully resolved in v1.0.1, I'd be most grateful if you'd confirm this @jamesjer
Version 1.0.1 looks great. Thank you so much for taking care of this so quickly. HPCombi should be in Fedora 40, which will be released in April.
I am looking at packaging HPCombi for Fedora, and would like to be sure I understand the license. The top-level LICENSE file contains the text of GPL version 3. However, nowhere is the actual version of the GPL specified. Many files have this text at the top:
That URL provides access to every version of the GPL. The Fedora licensing guidelines state that in this case, we presume the license to be GPL-1.0-or-later; i.e., that those who receive the code can choose to comply with any version of the GPL, including version 1.0. Is this your intention?
If you intend to specify GPL version 3, do you mean GPL-3.0-only or GPL-3.0-or-later?
It would be great if the exact license, with version number and "only" or "any later version", were specified somewhere in the distribution.