Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I was thinking of this a little differently:
Representation
Clinical Finding
Clinical History (Symptoms)
Physical Exam Findings (Signs)
Lab Findings
Image Findings
Clinical Picture
Diagnosis
Original comment by arab...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2009 at 8:29
BARRY SMITH response:
This looks good to me, except for the mixing of singulars and plurals
and some questions about clinical history and symptoms/signs
Correct version should be:
Representation
Clinical Finding
Physical Exam Finding
Lab Finding
Image Finding
Clinical Picture
Diagnosis
Questions
Can a clinical history not include the clinician asking the patient
about previous physical exam findings?
If we focus on the history of symptoms, can we divide these coherently
into two sorts:
i. those (such as pains, feelings of nausea) only experienceable by the patient
ii. physical symptoms (episodes of coughing, rashes)
Is a clinical history properly speaking a finding, or rather a
documentation of a set of findings?
BS
Original comment by albertgo...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2009 at 2:52
SIVARAM ARABANDI response to BARRY SMITH:
As the conversations on 'Symptom' and 'Sign' (note the use of singular) have
shown,
it is tricky to pin down what is or is not reported during a clinical history
taking.
But lets look at it from a what it should be (as opposed to what it can be):
Clinical History (syn. Medical History) is the information obtained from the
patient.
This consists of the history of present illness, review of systems, past
history,
family history, social history, sexual history, etc. The wikipedia definition
is
"Medical History of a patient is information gained by a physician or other
healthcare professional by asking specific questions, either of the patient or
of
other people who know the person and can give suitable information" .
Q) Can a clinical history not include the clinician asking the patient about
previous physical exam findings?
Clinical history focuses on what the patient feels and thinks. Patients can talk
about prior physical exam findings (i.e. signs) but these wouldn't be
considered as
'Symptoms'. We should think of Clinical History as a documentation of a set of
findings. And is not equal to just symptoms.
Q) can we divide these (symptoms) coherently into two sorts (see below for
details)?
From the examples, I think you want to differentiate between those that can
only be
felt by a patient and those that can be also be observed by a physician. I am
not
sure if there is a need for this differentiation - we may be complicating things
unnecessarily. In one of the other discussion, I had suggested the following:
"Symptom and Sign may be defined as subtypes of Clinical finding which would be
the
representational artifact counterpart of Clinical feature. This will allow
certain
Clinical features to be classified as both Symptom and Sign where needed (at the
instance level)."
I found this on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_(medicine)#Signs_versus_symptoms
Q) Is a clinical history properly speaking a finding, or rather a
documentation of a
set of findings?
Yes, clinical history would be a documentation of a set of findings discovered
by a
physician based on interviewing the patient.
Here is a new version (the discussion for some of this is on the wiki -
http://code.google.com/p/ogms/wiki/PhenotypeAndRelatedConcepts) :
Bodily Feature (syn. Phenotype) - is there really a difference between the
two?
Clinical Feature (syn. Clinical Phenotype) - def. = a bodily feature that is
clinically significant. (includes both normal as well as abnormal features).
Disease Phenotype - def.= a clinical feature associated with one or more
diseases
(or disorders) and is indicative of something abnormal
Normal Phenotype
Representation
Clinical Finding
Symptom - def.= a clinical feature that is reported by the patient during a
clinical history procedure (i.e. outputOf ClinicalHistoryProcedure).
Sign - def.= a clinical feature that is discovered by the physician during a
physical exam procedure (i.e. outputOf PhysicalExamProcedure).
Lab Finding
Image Finding
Clinical Picture
Diagnosis
Procedure
Clinical History procedure
Physical Exam procedure
thanks,
Sivaram
Original comment by albertgo...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2009 at 2:55
I noticed that the indentation of the proposed new structure was lost. Here it
is:
Bodily Feature (syn. Phenotype) - is there really a difference between the
two?
Clinical Feature (syn. Clinical Phenotype) - def. = a bodily feature that is clinically significant. (includes
both normal as well as abnormal features).
Disease Phenotype - def.= a clinical feature associated with one or more diseases (or disorders) and
is indicative of something abnormal
Normal Phenotype
Representation
Clinical Finding
Symptom - def.= a clinical feature that is reported by the patient during a clinical history procedure
(i.e. outputOf ClinicalHistoryProcedure).
Sign - def.= a clinical feature that is discovered by the physician during a physical exam procedure
(i.e. outputOf PhysicalExamProcedure).
Lab Finding
Image Finding
Clinical Picture
Diagnosis
Procedure
Clinical History procedure
Physical Exam procedure
Original comment by arab...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2009 at 4:08
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Propose the following refinement to the previous version:
Bodily Feature (syn. Phenotype) - is there really a difference between the two?
(see NOTE below)
Clinical Feature (syn. Clinical Phenotype) - def. = a bodily feature that is clinically significant. (includes
both normal as well as abnormal features).
Disease Phenotype - def.= a clinical feature associated with one or more diseases (or disorders) and
is indicative of something abnormal
Normal Phenotype - def.= a clinical feature that is not known to be associated with a disease or disorder
Symptom - def.= a clinical feature that is a departure from normal function or feeling which is
noticed by a patient, indicating the presence of disease or abnormality. A symptom is
subjective, observed by the patient, and not measured. [wikipedia]
e.g.: pain, cough, difficulty in swallowing, breathlessness, palpitations, nausea,
tiredness, etc
Sign - def.= a clinical feature that is discovered by a physician, is objective and measured
e.g.: tenderness, 3rd heart sound, rales, respiratory rate, blood pressure measurement, etc
Representation
Clinical Finding
History finding - def.= documentation of a Symptom reported by the patient during a
clinical history procedure
(i.e. outputOf ClinicalHistoryProcedure).
e.g. h/o chest pain, no h/o palpitations, past h/o breathlessness, etc
This definition may be loosened up to include documentation of events, disorders/diseases
that have occurred in the past, procedures, complications, medications etc.
Physical Exam finding - def.= documentation of a Sign that is discovered by the physician during a
physical exam procedure
(i.e. outputOf PhysicalExamProcedure).
e.g.: tenderness absent, rales (or crackles) heard on auscultation,
respiratory rate increased, etc
Lab Finding
Image Finding
Clinical Picture
Diagnosis
Procedure
Clinical History procedure
Physical Exam procedure
Original comment by sivaram....@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2009 at 2:19
NOTE: is there no difference between bodily feature and phenotype? Here are
some examples to work with:
1. Cough?
- it is clearly a Clinical Feature. But is it a (clinical) Phenotype?
- if we think of Cough as a function of the respiratory system and its purpose is to clear the breathing
passages of irritants, excess secretions etc., then it can thought of as a
Phenotype.
2. Pain?
3. Dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing)?
Original comment by sivaram....@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2009 at 9:16
Original comment by albertgo...@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2009 at 9:18
The problem is that scientists use phenotype both to refer to something as
atomic as
eye color as well as to refer to an entire constellation of features such as
with
Down syndrome.
Original comment by hoga...@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2009 at 10:49
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
albertgo...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2009 at 3:44