Closed jdelman closed 6 years ago
@jdelman Yes, the output file size would be roughly the same no matter whether you use x264
or x265
. That's because the target bitrate does not change. However, in most situations, quality will improve when using x265
at the same bitrate as x264
.
To reduce the bitrate, try adding --target small
to your command line.
I don't think I've done sufficient testing to provide guidance on options to match the visual quality of iTunes when using x265
. That's an "eye of the beholder" kind of thing anyway. :) And, for me, x265
is still too slow to be practical for home transcoding.
I hope that helps.
@jdelman I'll close this now, but feel free to continue commenting here or open a new issue.
I recently encoded a 1080p Blu-ray using the
--handbrake-option encoder=x265
option. It produced an MKV that was the same exact file size as when I had run it earlier without that option. It's my understanding that you can use a much lower bitrate with x265 but achieve similar results.What is a good target bitrate for x265 that would match the visual quality of iTunes? What arguments should I pass to
video-transcoding
?Thanks!