BUILDBOT_TEST is sufficiently descriptive (after all, 'buildbot' is the package name and the name of the binary invoked to create a buildmaster) and it's possible upstream may later remove the buildmaster terminology https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/5382 or alternatively we might move away from it downstream. As such, it seems prudent to use a name that would be unaffected.
This came partially from discussion at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115024 - I figure tweaking the name is a lot easier now, before it's fully documented/advertised and part of people's workflows, than later.
BUILDBOT_TEST is sufficiently descriptive (after all, 'buildbot' is the package name and the name of the binary invoked to create a buildmaster) and it's possible upstream may later remove the buildmaster terminology https://github.com/buildbot/buildbot/issues/5382 or alternatively we might move away from it downstream. As such, it seems prudent to use a name that would be unaffected.
This came partially from discussion at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115024 - I figure tweaking the name is a lot easier now, before it's fully documented/advertised and part of people's workflows, than later.