I compared the uncll(Version geklojban-1.2.13, Generated 2021-05-31) with original cll, and found what I believe are mistakes likely caused by overcomplex tanru structure in section 5.12 "Scalar negation of selbri"
To my understanding, the cmavo of selma'o JA associate words more closely than nothing at all, so:
(broda brode) brodi
(broda ja brode) brodi
broda (brode ja brodi)
I will attach the uncll text here and then present the modified version which I think is correct:
1.Example 5.121
uncll:
Now consider Example 5.121 and Example 5.122, which are equivalent in meaning, but use normal grouping and ke grouping respectively:
Example 5.121.
mi
sutra
cadzu
be
fi
le
birka
be'o
I
(quickly
(walking
using
the
arms
)
je
masno
klama
le
zarci
and
slowly)
go-to
the
market.
I go to the market, both quickly walking using my arms and slowly.
taking out the selbri, that will be:
sutra cadzu (be...be'o) je masno klama
where "cadzu" and "masno" will be connected more closely by "je", the structure becoming
(sutra (cadzu je masno)) klama
corrected:
Now consider Example 5.121 and Example 5.122, which are equivalent in meaning, but use bo grouping and ke grouping respectively:
Example 5.121.
mi
sutra
bo
cadzu
be
fi
le
birka
be'o
I
(quickly
(walking
using
the
arms
)
je
masno
klama
le
zarci
and
slowly)
go-to
the
market.
I go to the market, both quickly walking using my arms and slowly.
"bo" connects more closely than "je"
((sutra bo cadzu) je masno) klama
which agrees with Example 5.122
Similarily, Example 5.123 should also be modified:
Example 5.123.
mi
na'e
sutra
bo
cadzu
be
fi
le
birka
be'o
I
((non-
quickly)
(walking
using
the
arms
)
je
masno
klama
le
zarci
and
slowly)
go-to
the
market.
2.Example 5.125
A duplication of "[ke'e]" and one extra right parenthesis, they should be removed.
reported by la langer:
"bo" connects more closely than "je"
Similarily, Example 5.123 should also be modified: