Describe the bug
If using i18next v4 plural format, i18nAlly consider a plural key missing (i18n-ally-key-missing) when called with count
like reported a few years ago in #677. It should have been resolved but it appears not.
I have tried to force the framework but nothing changed.
Describe the bug If using i18next v4 plural format, i18nAlly consider a plural key missing (i18n-ally-key-missing) when called with count like reported a few years ago in #677. It should have been resolved but it appears not.
I have tried to force the framework but nothing changed.
Extension Version v2.11.1
Framework/i18n package you are using
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
By local config for i18n-ally
Device Infomation
Extension Log Go to
View
->Output
->i18n Ally
, and paste the content below. You should mask any sensitive informationScreenshots