Closed romulus0914 closed 4 years ago
@romulus0914 thanks! i believe the paper chose a 1d sequence as a simplified example, so people could visualize it better
@romulus0914 also, anonymous author reviewed that portion of the code and gave it a green light :) fairly certain it is correct
Thanks for your reply!
Thanks for the great work in the implementations!
I would like to ask whether there is a difference in using 'Conv2d' as suggested in Eq. 3 in the paper and your implementation of 'Conv3d'. These two convs treat the (h x w)-dimension as a 1-d sequence and a 2-d image, respectively. I believe they are quite different in concept.
Point out if I misunderstood.
Thx a lot.