Closed torarnv closed 7 months ago
I am an employee of The Qt Company
Does the original have the same issue with the point?
It seems so :grimacing:
Illustrator file in Inkscape, after moving one point by hand
But I (or whoever merges this) can easily just delete the point.
Does Qt qualify as open source thing? Seems so (Wikipedia entry):
But I (or whoever merges this) can easily just delete the point.
Is that necessary? Can't we keep the SVG as is? Is it a problem that two points overlap?
If we remove the additional point, is it not possible that some SVG renderers may not "complete" the path, and miss a segment of the logo?
Does Qt qualify as open source thing?
Qt is an open source project, licensed under both open source licenses and commercial license by The Qt Company.
Thanks @Finii !!
If we remove the additional point, is it not possible that some SVG renderers may not "complete" the path, and miss a segment of the logo?
No, the other closed paths also do not have double points ;-)
I'm not sure might even be that fontforge
would remove that point anyhow.
Nerdfonts for sure would ;-)
If we remove the additional point, is it not possible that some SVG renderers may not "complete" the path, and miss a segment of the logo?
No, the other closed paths also do not have double points ;-)
I'm not sure might even be that
fontforge
would remove that point anyhow. Nerdfonts for sure would ;-)
Thanks for the explanation :)
Note to the merger:
README is missing, but as we have a parallel 'almost ready' PR pending and still no automatic codepoint allocation on merge the merge would fail anyhow for one of the PRs.
Hmm, I used Pixelmator Pro to center the original SVG inside a 512x512 square viewport.
The original is from https://qtcompany.sharepoint.com/sites/Marketing-Public-Access/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?ga=1&id=%2Fsites%2FMarketing%2DPublic%2DAccess%2FShared%20Documents%2FQt%20Development%20Brand%20assets%20%2D%20Public%2FQt%20Logos%2FQt%20%2D%20Primary%20Logo%2FFor%20Designers%20and%20CMYK%20Printing%2FFor%20Screen%20%2D%20RGB%2FBlack&viewid=37b212b4%2Dfb2d%2D43ed%2Dad9f%2Df7e2e0d99f69
Does the original have the same issue with the point?
The source is https://www.qt.io/brand-internal/development/logo