[Feature Request] Consider using manylinux instead of musl to support multiple targets

luke-goddard / enumy

Linux post exploitation privilege escalation enumeration

MIT License

253 stars 33 forks source link

[Feature Request] Consider using manylinux instead of musl to support multiple targets #29

Open WorksButNotTested opened 4 years ago

WorksButNotTested commented 4 years ago

The manylinux project is used as a basis for native python PIP modules to build binaries which run on many linux distributions. This may provide a simpler/more compatible alternative to musl?

https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/blob/master/docker/Dockerfile-x86_64

luke-goddard commented 4 years ago

Yeah, that seems like a great alternative for X86 and X64 releases, but I want to eventually support compiling to ARM. I think I will have to use musl for ARM compilation. Not sure, not done much research yet. I definitely like the idea of getting rid of musl though.