Asterix can't decide how to spell "adapter" / "adaptor". "Adapter" is much more
widespread - about ~3000 mentions throughout the source code, test files, and
so on, vs. about 200 for "adaptor". There a couple public API usage of
"adaptor" in the Feeds API, which is a bit unfortunate.
This obviously isn't hugely important, but it does look a little silly to see
this (from AQLParser.java) :
adaptorName = AdapterName();
If nobody objects, I think I'll write a perl script to s/adaptor/adapter/i in
Asterix. (Hyracks appears to have settled solely on "adapter".)
Ceej
aka Chris Hillery
P.S. A little Googling shows that there is no consistent distinction between
the two. There's some evidence that "adapter" is preferred when talking about a
*person* who can adapt, but when it comes to *things* that adapt, you'll find
about equal usage of both. It's not consistently a British / American thing
either. For what it's worth, the Java 7 SDK seems to use "adapter" exclusively
for package and class names.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by c...@lambda.nu on 8 Oct 2014 at 12:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
c...@lambda.nu
on 8 Oct 2014 at 12:59