2024_08 TEST PSY Flow Meters

[ljmoody]

All TEST cards for Flow:

3199 CC & MM

3072 PSY

3204 Team Care (AGG)

3205 Team Flow (SP)

AC:

• [x] test PSY
• [x] provide feedback to DEV
• [x] stocks have color code key

• [ ] all feedback to DEV is addressed and/or incorporated

  ~- [ ] When the user clicks on the "Flow" icon from the Dynamic Decision Dashboard, the user is presented with a new browser tab with the diagram depicted in the wireframe.~

• [x] The flows and stock variables are proportional to each other based on the instructions in the wireframe.
• [x] Flows are labeled with actual values.
• [x] Stocks change color based on rules depicted in the wireframe.

[ljmoody]

fyi: @jamesmrollins @lijenn @tejaspesquare

Feedback for PSY Flow Diagram:

• Numbers populated correlate with what I see in the simulation so I believe the flow diagram is behaving as expected.
• [x] 1. Change "appts" to "pts", 4 locations:

~- [ ] 2. Ending Service Rate vs Ending Rate - awaiting Lindsey's feedback in #3199 before knowing which label to amend: ~

~- [ ] 3. Start Rate vs Starting Rate - awaiting Lindsey's feedback (as above) before knowing if these labels may need to be amended.~

• [x] 4. Capitalize "d" in "during" (highlighted):

[tejaspesquare]

Hello @ljmoody

PSY- Modifications have been done and are now accessible on the testing environment for validation.

Feedback for PSY Flow Diagram:

• Numbers populated correlate with what I see in the simulation so I believe the flow diagram is behaving as expected.
• [x] 1. Change "appts" to "pts", 4 locations:

• [x] 4. Capitalize "d" in "during" (highlighted):

[ljmoody]

@tejaspesquare, please incorporate the following:

• [x] Change highlighted text to: "Ending Rate"

• [x] Discussed with @jamesmrollins at Team Praxis meeting today: With 0.23 in and 0.23 out (as shown on graphic), it doesn't appear to meet the logic requirement needed for the stock to show as red. Is it possible to change the computation to consider 3 significant digits to determine the stock color? Would that work for this example - or would it still be computing as "less than or equal to" the output number?

[tejaspesquare]

Hello @ljmoody

Required changes being made & available on TEST.

• [x] Change highlighted text to: "Ending Rate"

• [x] Discussed with @jamesmrollins at Team Praxis meeting today: With 0.23 in and 0.23 out (as shown on graphic), it doesn't appear to meet the logic requirement needed for the stock to show as red. Is it possible to change the computation to consider 3 significant digits to determine the stock color? Would that work for this example - or would it still be computing as "less than or equal to" the output number?

Note: We have not considered 3 digits for computation, it remain same for 2 digits.

[ljmoody]

✅ verified:

• Points 1 & 4 are complete
• Ending Service Rate changed to Ending Rate
• Stock color logic working correctly

@tejaspesquare, so I better understand, did you make an adjustment to the logic that made the stock color change? It's correct now. And just like in the example I posted, the numbers in and out are equal. So I'm wondering what made the difference.

• [ ] Noticed a misspelling when looking at the CC Flow. Please change to "Appointments":

[tejaspesquare]

Hello @ljmoody ,

Please verify on TEST.

@tejaspesquare, so I better understand, did you make an adjustment to the logic that made the stock color change? It's correct now. And just like in the example I posted, the numbers in and out are equal. So I'm wondering what made the difference.

Variable conversion is implemented in one of the code blocks. Previously, the variable had more than 5 decimal digits, leading to an unexpected outcome.

• [ ] Noticed a misspelling when looking at the CC Flow. Please change to "Appointments": Psy

[ljmoody]

@tejaspesquare - thanks for explaining the stock color variable conversion. I tried to verify above change today, but flow does not appear in TEST:

So I tried DEV, but it's not there either:

Please let me know when it's back in the Sim and I'll test then.

[tejaspesquare]

Hello @ljmoody ,

Apologize for any inconvenience caused. This feature is enabled for CC, MM, and PSY on TEST.

CC

MM

PSY

[lzim]

wk4 2024_07 - @lzim reviewing Flows across modules https://github.com/lzim/teampsd/issues/3199 CC & MM https://github.com/lzim/teampsd/issues/3204 Team Care (AGG) https://github.com/lzim/teampsd/issues/3205 Team Flow (SP)

#sim_ui_workflow @matomasz @lijenn @ljmoody @jamesmrollins @tejaspesquare

We need a message to clarify. how to interpret color stock indicators

• [x] Recommend a color key that with this text below Red = Inflow > Outflow Blue = Outflow > Inflow

[ljmoody]

@tejaspesquare - following up on this card. Do you have an update for us or rough ETA for when we can test?

[ljmoody]

Discussed at 8/9/24 Team Praxis meeting:

• @lzim's suggestion in above comment will be tracked in a new card: #3248

We need a message to clarify. how to interpret color stock indicators

• [ ] Recommend a color key that with this text below Red = Inflow > Outflow Blue = Outflow > Inflow

[matthewtomo]

week 3 2024_08 Praxis Meeting @matthewtomo @jamesmrollins @ljmoody

• @tejaspesquare do we have the go ahead to test the PSY flow meters? AND Is it available for testing in the TEST environment?

[tejaspesquare]

Hi Matthew

• @tejaspesquare do we have the go ahead to test the PSY flow meters? AND Is it available for testing in the TEST environment?

The PSY flow meter is currently available for testing, excluding the changes to the color stock indicator and the dynamic flow size (height), which will be available after receiving confirmation for the MM model changes (#3204).

[matthewtomo]

Discussed Dev Standup wk4 2024_08 @matthewtomo @tejaspesquare

• Once MM is finalized, the color stock indicator and the dynamic flow size (height) behavior can be added into the already developed Flow Diagrams (including PSY).