Closed niconiconi closed 1 year ago
Crystal Disk Info gives you exact data about TBW to a given SSD. Just run it first, then run one plot, and go back to Crystal Disk Info.
Crystal Disk Info gives you exact data about TBW to a given SSD. Just run it first, then run one plot, and go back to Crystal Disk Info.
I have other applications run on that SSD, so it's not accurate.
assuming that a plot requires 1.3Tib (about 1.43TB) of written data and 75% of writes are on tmp2, I would assume that you save about 1.07TB of writes by using a ramdisk. However I cannot test since my ram is just 32G. By the way, even with less ram, you can use programs like PrimoCache to have a consistent benefit, for me it's around 26% of saved writes with 21G ram
assuming that a plot requires 1.3Tib (about 1.43TB) of written data and 75% of writes are on tmp2, I would assume that you save about 1.07TB of writes by using a ramdisk. However I cannot test since my ram is just 32G. By the way, even with less ram, you can use programs like PrimoCache to have a consistent benefit, for me it's around 26% of saved writes with 21G ram
Hardly believe that temp2 takes 75% writes. putting slow HDD on temp2 didnt expands plot time so much as for temp1 And why -t and -2 work opposite -t is temp2 and -2 is temp1!? Strange...
@RenarYnosX Huh? What are you talking about?
-t, --tmpdir arg Temporary directory, needs ~220 GiB (default = $PWD)
-2, --tmpdir2 arg Temporary directory 2, needs ~110 GiB [RAM] (default = <tmpdir>)
@niconiconi
with tmp/tmp2 split, tmp takes in total ~370G of io sent to storage device.
so basically with this parameter:
-t ssd_path -2 ramdisk_path -f ssd_path
Assuming ramdisk has 120GB space.
How much SSD write per plot?