search

manaakiwhenua / dggs-lu-tex

Latex files for paper submitted to Big Earth Data: "Using a DGGS for a scalable, interoperable, and reproducible system of land-use classification"
0 stars 0 forks source link

p13 fig5 #24

Closed alpha-beta-soup closed 3 months ago

alpha-beta-soup commented 3 months ago

consider unifying into one plot (use different symbols and linestyles, evtl. omit indexing -seems pretty linear- or put in separate figure) That would improve comparability and show e.g. crossing points more easily.

If not, at least label also the right x-axis although it's quite obvious.

alpha-beta-soup commented 3 months ago

I feel that combining the graphs might make it harder to interpret, as it would require the reader to simultaneously interpret colour and symbology to determine whether a line relates firstly to DGGS or vector/raster (currently: left/right; potentially: symbology), and secondly which stage of the process (colour).

It would be faster to determine crossing points, yes. I have made no change as I suspect the benefits and the disbenefits of change are about even, and other reviewers have not requested this change.