Open marnen opened 8 years ago
Some characters shouldn't always ligate. We should probably have separate OpenType features to control language-specific behavior.
=>
≥
/=
≠
-->
<!--
More as I think of it, or as I receive comments from others...
See also #6.
Some characters shouldn't always ligate. We should probably have separate OpenType features to control language-specific behavior.
Erlang
=>
isn't an arrow; rather, it's a comparison operator. It should either not ligate or (perhaps) look more like≥
.Haskell
/=
means 'not equal'. Should its ligature look more like≠
if Haskell mode is enabled?HTML/XML
-->
isn't an arrow; it closes a comment. (But we could still handle it like Monoid does and just make a corresponding<!--
ligature.)More as I think of it, or as I receive comments from others...