Open Huite opened 1 year ago
Thanks for finding this issue. It indeed seems incorrect. Strangely, ttim gives reasonable results if the order is anything but 4. So 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 all gives reasonable to good results. I will have to investigate. Maybe really unlucky placement of control points? Incidentally, you also get unreasonable results when the string is impermeable, which will make looking for the bug easier.
In this case a well is placed behind a leaky line doublet, yet the head increases in front of the doublet.
A minimum working example:
If the line doublet geometry is simplified to just two points, the answer looks more reasonable: