codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 25.97% and project coverage change: -0.32 :warning:
Comparison is base (
7631909) 86.45% compared to head (bb1f22e) 86.14%.
:mega: This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #113 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 86.45% 86.14% -0.32% ========================================== Files 99 99 Lines 15306 15379 +73 Branches 785 785 ========================================== + Hits 13233 13248 +15 - Misses 1288 1346 +58 Partials 785 785 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/mentat-collective/emmy/pull/113?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/emmy/abstract/function.cljc](https://codecov.io/gh/mentat-collective/emmy/pull/113?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None#diff-c3JjL2VtbXkvYWJzdHJhY3QvZnVuY3Rpb24uY2xqYw==) | `63.25% <25.97%> (-20.55%)` | :arrow_down: | ... and [2 files with indirect coverage changes](https://codecov.io/gh/mentat-collective/emmy/pull/113/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None) Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=None):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Full port of
litfun.scmand the function descriptor language from scmutils.== Literal Function Descriptor Language
We support some of the possible literal function types; these are type signatures like
(-> (UP Real Real) Real). Butlitfun.scmhas support for a richer language.litfun.scmand port the full scope of function descriptor language, including lots of helper functions likeLagrangian. There are also many examples here that would make great tests. This can live inemmy.abstract.function.cljc(UP* Real)should work, with no explicit arity.([] '(-> (UP Real (UP* Real) (DOWN* Real)) Real))([] '(-> (UP Real (UP* Real) (UP* Real)) Real)). the current impl can't handle stars with no numbers.