Open graybeal opened 3 years ago
As I've been troubleshooting I have been creating Q&A about value sets in https://docs.google.com/document/d/10KJsxHZfHb-ZD-xPJN5-HD2sJplLHGodHVVIdqqGT5k/edit#. So far I have the following, bold items are relevant to this issue.
There are only 3 value sets in BioPortal per above, CEDARVS, CADSR-VS, and NLMVS. CEDAR can't identify any of them, either as auto-complete in the 'search within ontologies' field (but I think that option only looks for ontologies) nor when using the find value sets button. (So it isn't just the parsing or Obsolete issues with CADSR-VS causing this. In fact I can search for 'delivery' in the same string as above and it returns NLMVS values too, but CEDAR can't see those either.
It appears the "search for value sets" command does not work as expected, at least at the moment. The call that generates (if I captured it correctly) looks like
https://terminology.metadatacenter.org/bioportal/search?q=Delivery%20Procedures&scope=value_sets&page=1&page_size=500
but it returns matching terms (and the value sets that contain them), not actual value set name matches. Maybe that's by design but the UI doesn't suggest it works that way. And of course, none of that gets reported back to the user anyway. Report this as a separate bug?
In the template editor, a search term of T0 yields only classes (394 of them). But if we take the search string that CEDAR is making and run it, we see many values from the CEDAR-VS value set.
https://terminology.metadatacenter.org/bioportal/search?q=t0&scope=classes,values&page=1&page_size=500
And CEDAR can't even see the CEDAR-VS value set (or NLMVW) when I try to enter it as an ontology to search on or for.