Added: ISO 690:2021 Style (beta)

wg030 commented 1 year ago

I have tried to improve on this style for the last few months with respect to the latest edition of the ISO 690 (see #83) and with this PR I like to publish my work. I am going to open a new issue for a discussion whre I am going to explain more about it.

Altough this version 0.1 of a "ISO 690:2021 Biblatex Bibliography Style" is cosnidered a beta version for testing since it is still incomplete and likely quite error-prone, it solves a few of the open issues:

It closes #81 and also closes #116 by introducing a new field called mediumdesignator as suggested by moewew.
It resolves #82 because the field volume is now idepentend from the field mailtitle. To be able to distinguish I introduced a new mainvolume field.
It closes #83 since we now have at least a functional beta version for the fourth edition of the ISO 690 (2021).
It fixes #87 by the now supporting the eid field.
It resolves #94 by allowing related entries with a bunch of predefined related entry types such as translationof or commentaryon.
It should also resolve #101 because the noenddot option is still implemented.
It easily closes #122 since the order of urldateand url is now supposed to be the other way round.

SimonBrandner commented 10 months ago

@michal-h21 and @wg030, hey, how are you doing? Any chance this could be moved forward? My high school requires my graduation thesis to use ISO 690:2022, so this would be quite useful (even though I can probably get away with ISO 690:2010)... Any way I can help?

michal-h21 commented 10 months ago

You can try to use this work-in-progress style. The new ISO version is unfortunately quite complex, so it is pretty hard to support automatic bibliography formatting.

wg030 commented 10 months ago

@michal-h21 and @wg030, hey, how are you doing? Any chance this could be moved forward? My high school requires my graduation thesis to use ISO 690:2022, so this would be quite useful (even though I can probably get away with ISO 690:2010)...

As @michal-h21 said, the most current version of the ISO 690:2021 implementation is given in my temporary repository https://github.com/wg030/biblatex-iso690_2021 and work will continue there until it is has been tested enough and is finally ready to be merged here.

Any way I can help?

I see that you are a Czech native speaker?! So one thing you could do to help us is provide a Czech translation by filling the empty language template newlang-iso690_2021.lbx. Besides it would also help us a lot if you tested your own bibliography against the latest version of the style and report any entries which do not look like you would expect them to look like according to the rules of the ISO 690:2021 norm.

michal-h21 / biblatex-iso690

Added: ISO 690:2021 Style (beta) #124