Open masonwolff opened 2 months ago
Not sure if you are asking two questions here @masonwolff?
microsoftGraph
provider?provider
or extension
statement (extension
to be added in the upcoming v0.29 Bicep release - see https://github.com/Azure/bicep/issues/14374)?For 1: yes, we plan to remove this requirement, once the Bicep "extensibility" feature comes out of preview.
For 2: we have discussed whether this statement is required or not, if the resource declarations already have the Microsoft.Graph namespace. I think this one is still TBD, and the provider
/extension
statement is still required for now.
@masonwolff Have I answered your question? If so, please go ahead and close this issue.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I am wondering if there is a plan to remove the need for the experimental features configuration that is required to access the "microsoftGraph" provider?