Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
if you call a tool on a Real CNC it is recected to the Tool change position
only on some real weard mashines okuma it will return to the last XY move
on normal Mashines it will be inthe upper zone if it comes out of the Tool
change so this woudt be ok !!
TESTET on Haas VF2,5,Minimill
Original comment by sammello...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2011 at 6:10
When I programmed that post, I intended for it to be up in the air, as it would
be right after a toolchange. I figured that the machine would rapid to XY in
that position and then drop down to the Z clearance height. If you need a
different post processor- it's really easy enough to copy that emc2b.py file
and the emc2b_read.py file to something like emc3.py and emc3_read.py. Then
have a look at the tool change def in iso.py here:
def tool_change(self, id):
self.write_blocknum()
self.write((iso.codes.TOOL() % id) + '\n')
self.t = id
You could probably copy that into your new post processor -emc3.py (which would
over ride it with your new definition) and maybe put in a safe Z height for
your particular machine at the end like:
def tool_change(self, id):
self.write_blocknum()
self.write((iso.codes.TOOL() % id) + '\n')
self.t = id + '\n'
self.write("G0 Z6.00\n")
You would then need to add your new machine listing to machines.txt like this:
emc3 Linux EMC3 kc8wmc's gantry post - 0
Take a look at it and comment back here. You could pop into irc at #cam or
#heekscad on freenode and someone could help you make a good post for your
machine.
Dan
Original comment by ddfalck2...@yahoo.com
on 12 Feb 2011 at 2:59
It looks pretty real to me :) However, it's a small hobbyist machine with a
manual tool changer - if the same tool is in use, a common case, there is no
physical tool change or tool movement, just close the tool change prompt. I
appreciate the insight into bigger machine operation.
Thanks for the effort, Dan - it looks pretty straightforward. It will be a few
days until my job will allow time to work with the machine, and I'll comment
here. IMHO guaranteeing the tool is left at a safe height irregardless of
starting position seems appropriate, but my perspective is limited and your
approach works for me.
Original comment by kc8...@gmail.com
on 13 Feb 2011 at 12:33
Original comment by danhe...@gmail.com
on 24 Mar 2014 at 8:07
This issue just confounded me a little. I guess one can set zero, then manually
lift the z axis up off of the stock, then start program.
Original comment by jamcinn...@gmail.com
on 25 Aug 2014 at 8:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
kc8...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2011 at 5:11