When porting some code (which up to now used cmark) to MD4C I missed some information from the parser which is represented as attributes in the CommonMark DTD:
In the details for MD_BLOCK_UL, the information whether the list is "tight" or "loose" (attribute tight (true|false).
In the details for MD_BLOCK_OL, the information whether the list is "tight" or "loose" (attribute tight (true|false), and which style of item marker was used (attribute delimiter (period|paren)).
Any chance to put corresponding information into MD_BLOCK_UL_DETAIL rsp MD_BLOCK_OL_DETAIL?
When porting some code (which up to now used
cmark
) to MD4C I missed some information from the parser which is represented as attributes in the CommonMark DTD:In the details for
MD_BLOCK_UL
, the information whether the list is "tight" or "loose" (attributetight (true|false)
.In the details for
MD_BLOCK_OL
, the information whether the list is "tight" or "loose" (attributetight (true|false)
, and which style of item marker was used (attributedelimiter (period|paren)
).Any chance to put corresponding information into
MD_BLOCK_UL_DETAIL
rspMD_BLOCK_OL_DETAIL
?"CommonMark DTD on GitHub"