Two sub-issues for this:
(1) The xsl2rdf.xsl transform, in its second template (matching vc:collection), outputs the assertion “#:[vra:vra/vra:collection/@refid] rdf:type void:DataSet.” We believe this is incorrect because a vra:collection is an aggregate of built or created objects, i.e. an aggregate of many vra:work. Very few collections, if any, would be a void:DataSet. It is as if the assumption is that the “collection” is the metadata itself. Our collection, in contrast, is a collection of photographs.
(2) The value for rdfs:label for the collection is mapped to the value at vra:vra/vra:collection/@source. That seems incorrect. The value for @source for vra:collection seems to be the name of the repository, which does not make a very good label for the collection.
Two sub-issues for this: (1) The xsl2rdf.xsl transform, in its second template (matching vc:collection), outputs the assertion “#:[vra:vra/vra:collection/@refid] rdf:type void:DataSet.” We believe this is incorrect because a vra:collection is an aggregate of built or created objects, i.e. an aggregate of many vra:work. Very few collections, if any, would be a void:DataSet. It is as if the assumption is that the “collection” is the metadata itself. Our collection, in contrast, is a collection of photographs. (2) The value for rdfs:label for the collection is mapped to the value at vra:vra/vra:collection/@source. That seems incorrect. The value for @source for vra:collection seems to be the name of the repository, which does not make a very good label for the collection.