Closed Simonlee711 closed 2 weeks ago
Wondering if there are work arounds that can be documented in the README.md
or we should also just try to fix?
I think there was a bug with Polaris 1.3 or 1 4 that mandated the 1.1 dependency, so we can likely update to 1.5+
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024, 12:05 AM Simon Lee @.***> wrote:
Wondering if there are work arounds that can be documented in the README.md or we should also just try to fix?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/mmcdermott/MEDS-DEV/issues/32#issuecomment-2456243336, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADS5XYXZLF7MILLTPSG4D3Z7A7YRAVCNFSM6AAAAABRFWJLQWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINJWGI2DGMZTGY . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
@Simonlee711 -- have you seen any issues using polars 1.5 and/or any other updates for this? Or does this still need investigation from the MEDS side?
@mmcdermott we can close the issue. We modified meds-evaluation to now be compatible with polars==1.5
. Everything should be resolved now
Have a dependency issue between MEDS eval and Aces:
es-aces 0.5.0 requires polars==1.5.*, but you have polars 1.1.0 which is incompatible.
andmeds-evaluation 0.1.dev57+g5793cb7 requires polars~=1.1.0, but you have polars 1.5.0 which is incompatible.
.